Hi,

Friendly ping:

Who can ack or review this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that I replaced "!! fall through !!" and "!!! fall through !!!"
comments with "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is
expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744899 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744900 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744901 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
  drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c | 19 +++++++------------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c
index de50349a39ce..1e400f2aaece 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c
@@ -427,17 +427,13 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_plogi(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport, 
enum rport_event event)
case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
                bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
-               /*
-                * !! fall through !!
-                */
+               /* fall through */
        case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
                if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
                        bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
bfa_fcxp_discard(rport->fcxp);
-               /*
-                * !! fall through !!
-                */
+               /* fall through */
        case RPSM_EVENT_FAILED:
                if (rport->plogi_retries < BFA_FCS_RPORT_MAX_RETRIES) {
                        rport->plogi_retries++;
@@ -868,9 +864,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_adisc_online(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport,
                 * At least go offline when a PLOGI is received.
                 */
                bfa_fcxp_discard(rport->fcxp);
-               /*
-                * !!! fall through !!!
-                */
+               /* fall through */
case RPSM_EVENT_FAILED:
        case RPSM_EVENT_ADDRESS_CHANGE:
@@ -1056,6 +1050,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_fc4_logosend(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s 
*rport,
case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
                bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
+               /* fall through */
        case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
                if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
                        bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
@@ -1144,9 +1139,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_hcb_offline(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s 
*rport,
                        bfa_fcs_rport_send_plogiacc(rport, NULL);
                        break;
                }
-               /*
-                * !! fall through !!
-                */
+               /* fall through */
case RPSM_EVENT_ADDRESS_CHANGE:
                if (!bfa_fcs_lport_is_online(rport->port)) {
@@ -1303,6 +1296,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_hcb_logosend(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s 
*rport,
case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
                bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
+               /* fall through */
        case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
                if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
                        bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
@@ -1346,6 +1340,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_logo_sending(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s 
*rport,
case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
                bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
+               /* fall through */
        case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
                if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
                        bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);

Reply via email to