When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/mm/fault.c b/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
index 8672ab7..d5b1e3d 100644
--- a/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ find_fixup_code(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
- if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs))) != 0) {
+ if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs))) !=
NULL) {
/* Adjust the instruction pointer in the stackframe. */
instruction_pointer(regs) = fixup->fixup;
arch_fixup(regs);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
