On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:32:55PM +0530, Kalyani Akula wrote:
> This patch adds SHA3 driver suuport for the Xilinx
> ZynqMP SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalyani Akula <kalyani.ak...@xilinx.com>

Hello

I have some comment below

> +static int zynqmp_sha_init(struct ahash_request *req)
> +{
> +     const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops = zynqmp_pm_get_eemi_ops();
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_reqctx *ctx = ahash_request_ctx(req);
> +     struct crypto_ahash *tfm = crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req);
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_ctx *tctx = crypto_ahash_ctx(tfm);
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_dev *dd = NULL;
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_dev *tmp;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (!eemi_ops || !eemi_ops->sha_hash)
> +             return -ENOTSUPP;
> +

Where can I find sha_hash() ?
It seems that your serie miss some patchs.

> +     spin_lock_bh(&zynqmp_sha.lock);
> +     if (!tctx->dd) {
> +             list_for_each_entry(tmp, &zynqmp_sha.dev_list, list) {
> +                     dd = tmp;
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +             tctx->dd = dd;
> +     } else {
> +             dd = tctx->dd;
> +     }
> +     spin_unlock_bh(&zynqmp_sha.lock);
> +
> +     ctx->dd = dd;
> +     dev_dbg(dd->dev, "init: digest size: %d\n",
> +             crypto_ahash_digestsize(tfm));
> +
> +     ret = eemi_ops->sha_hash(0, 0, ZYNQMP_SHA3_INIT);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_sha_update(struct ahash_request *req)
> +{
> +     const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops = zynqmp_pm_get_eemi_ops();
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_ctx *tctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm);
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_dev *dd = tctx->dd;
> +     size_t dma_size = req->nbytes;
> +     dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> +     char *kbuf;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (!req->nbytes)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     if (!eemi_ops || !eemi_ops->sha_hash)
> +             return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +     kbuf = dma_alloc_coherent(dd->dev, dma_size, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!kbuf)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     scatterwalk_map_and_copy(kbuf, req->src, 0, req->nbytes, 0);
> +      __flush_cache_user_range((unsigned long)kbuf,
> +                               (unsigned long)kbuf + dma_size);
> +     ret = eemi_ops->sha_hash(dma_addr, req->nbytes, ZYNQMP_SHA3_UPDATE);

Even with the sha_hash prototype missing, I think your driver have a problem:
You support having more than one device, but sha_hash lacks any reference on 
the device doing the request.

> +static int zynqmp_sha_final(struct ahash_request *req)
> +{
> +     const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops = zynqmp_pm_get_eemi_ops();
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_ctx *tctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm);
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_dev *dd = tctx->dd;
> +     size_t dma_size = SHA384_DIGEST_SIZE;
> +     dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> +     char *kbuf;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (!eemi_ops || !eemi_ops->sha_hash)
> +             return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +     kbuf = dma_alloc_coherent(dd->dev, dma_size, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!kbuf)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     ret = eemi_ops->sha_hash(dma_addr, dma_size, ZYNQMP_SHA3_FINAL);
> +     memcpy(req->result, kbuf, 48);

It is better to use SHA384_DIGEST_SIZE instead of 48

[...]
> +static int zynqmp_sha_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct zynqmp_sha_dev *sha_dd;
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     sha_dd = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sha_dd), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!sha_dd)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     sha_dd->dev = dev;
> +     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sha_dd);
> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sha_dd->list);
> +     spin_lock_init(&sha_dd->lock);
> +     crypto_init_queue(&sha_dd->queue, ZYNQMP_SHA_QUEUE_LENGTH);

You create a queue, but you didnt use it.

[...]
> +     spin_lock(&zynqmp_sha.lock);
> +     list_add_tail(&sha_dd->list, &zynqmp_sha.dev_list);
> +     spin_unlock(&zynqmp_sha.lock);
> +
> +     err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(44));
> +     if (err < 0)
> +             dev_err(dev, "no usable DMA configuration");

It is an error that you ignore, you miss some goto errxxx.

Regards

Reply via email to