On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:11 AM Brian Masney <masn...@onstation.org> wrote:
> Note: The qcom,pms405-gpio looks suspicious to me. The existing code > will start at gpio1, which is supposed to be a hole according to the > comment. I can fix this in a later patch if there is a desire. I didn't > do it now to try to keep this series as small as possible. Its no > worse than what was there before. If the range has holes the valid_mask should be set up to mask them off for this variant. That would be a separate patch though and hardly your problem as you say. Yours, Linus Walleij
