On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:55:31PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:43:57PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Is it possible to use an allyesconfig rather than an allmodconfig? That > > would leave all relevant options built-in. > > The allyesconfig would make it more difficult to apply this approach to > real hardware which is part of the goal here - the idea was to come up > with a way of making runnable configurations which are likely to be > usable with random userspace testsuites in order to avoid needing ever > expanding combinations of builds.
Ok. Is it somehow possible to fuse defconfig with an allmodconfig, with defconfig's CONFIG_FOO=y taking precedence over allmodconfig's CONFIG_FOO=m? IIUC, that would give you the necessary platform bits, at least for anything supported by defconfig. That would also happen to get CONFIG_UNIX=y, too. Thanks, Mark.
