On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Ran Wang wrote: > From: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bha...@nxp.com> > > CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL is not dependent on FSL_SOC, it can be built on > non-PPC platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bha...@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig > index 16758b1..53cbc0c 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Kconfig > @@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ config XPS_USB_HCD_XILINX > devices only. > > config USB_EHCI_FSL > - tristate "Support for Freescale PPC on-chip EHCI USB controller" > - depends on FSL_SOC > + tristate "Support for Freescale on-chip EHCI USB controller" > + depends on USB_EHCI_HCD
This line is not needed. The entire entry lies within an "if USB_EHCI_HCD" block. Alan Stern > select USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT > ---help--- > Variation of ARC USB block used in some Freescale chips. >
