* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> I think this was sent before, and it did cause problems before. Would 
> there be *any* reason to have non-threaded softirqs but threaded 
> hardirqs. I can see lots of issues with that.

please elaborate in precise terms: what issues can you see?

        Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to