On 10-01-19, 05:30, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
> Provide a generic call back so we can get rid of duplicated code in the
> drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swb...@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/cpu_cooling.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
We may be doing this differently, but I found some other issues with
the patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index dfd23245f778..5154ffc12332 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
>
> cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[0].frequency;
> cpufreq_cdev->cdev = cdev;
> + policy->cooldev = cdev;
Why was this required ? The below routine was already doing it...
>
> mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
> /* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */
> @@ -785,6 +786,23 @@ of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpufreq_cooling_register);
>
> +/**
> + * generic_cpufreq_ready - generic driver callback to register a
> thermal_cooling_device
> + * @policy: cpufreq policy
> + */
> +void generic_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + struct thermal_cooling_device **cdev = &policy->cooldev;
> +
> + *cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
... here
> + if (IS_ERR(*cdev)) {
We never get an error here, only NULL.
> + pr_err("Failed to register cpufreq cooling device for CPU%d:
> %ld\n",
> + policy->cpu, PTR_ERR(cdev));
The of_cpufreq_cooling_register() routine already prints enough error
messages on failures.
> + cdev = NULL;
This is a meaningless statement, perhaps you wanted to do *cdev = NULL
:)
--
viresh
