Hi, Friendly ping (second one):
Who can ack/review/take this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:31 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114976 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114977 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c index 6c2fb55d739b..1a61806739ff 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c @@ -4645,9 +4645,11 @@ lpfc_check_sli_ndlp(struct lpfc_hba *phba, case CMD_GEN_REQUEST64_CR: if (iocb->context_un.ndlp == ndlp) return 1; + /* fall through */ case CMD_ELS_REQUEST64_CR: if (icmd->un.elsreq64.remoteID == ndlp->nlp_DID) return 1; + /* fall through */ case CMD_XMIT_ELS_RSP64_CX: if (iocb->context1 == (uint8_t *) ndlp) return 1; @@ -5791,7 +5793,7 @@ lpfc_disc_timeout_handler(struct lpfc_vport *vport)case LPFC_LINK_UP:lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport); - /* Drop thru */ + /* fall through */ case LPFC_LINK_UNKNOWN: case LPFC_WARM_START: case LPFC_INIT_START:
