Re: [PATCH 22/41] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_ct: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Hi,

Friendly ping (second one):

Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:31 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
index 6305ffeba7ea..b2b7fcc23654 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c
@@ -3050,6 +3050,7 @@ lpfc_fdmi_cmd(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct 
lpfc_nodelist *ndlp,
        case SLI_MGMT_GHAT:
        case SLI_MGMT_GRPL:
                rsp_size = FC_MAX_NS_RSP;
+               /* fall through */
        case SLI_MGMT_DHBA:
        case SLI_MGMT_DHAT:
                pe = (struct lpfc_fdmi_port_entry *)&CtReq->un.PortID;
@@ -3062,6 +3063,7 @@ lpfc_fdmi_cmd(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct 
lpfc_nodelist *ndlp,
        case SLI_MGMT_GPAT:
        case SLI_MGMT_GPAS:
                rsp_size = FC_MAX_NS_RSP;
+               /* fall through */
        case SLI_MGMT_DPRT:
        case SLI_MGMT_DPA:
                pe = (struct lpfc_fdmi_port_entry *)&CtReq->un.PortID;