On 11/01/19 10:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> > > Currently the timer code checks if the clock pointer passed to it is > good (!IS_ERR(clk)). The new clocksource driver expects the clock to > be functional and doesn't perform any checks so emit a warning if > clk_get() fails. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
I think 4-9 can be a single patch. They are doing something very similar and its unlikely we will have to patch/revert just one of them. Thanks, Sekhar
