On Monday, January 14, 2019 5:34:53 PM CET Amit Kucheria wrote: > Several cpufreq drivers register themselves as thermal cooling devices. > Adding a pointer to struct cpufreq_policy removes the need for them to > store this pointer in a private data structure. > > We can then auto-register the cpufreq driver as a thermal cooling device > from cpufreq core code. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > index c86d6d8bdfed..7d0cf54125fa 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; > enum cpufreq_table_sorting freq_table_sorted; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL > + /* Pointer to the cooling device if used for thermal mitigation */ > + struct thermal_cooling_device *cooldev; > +#endif > +
Why here and not at the end of the struct? > struct list_head policy_list; > struct kobject kobj; > struct completion kobj_unregister; > Also, I would suggest combining this one with patch [02/10].
