> + if (dirty) > + kvm_release_pfn_dirty(map->pfn); > + else > + kvm_release_pfn_clean(map->pfn); > + map->hva = NULL;
I keep on having this gnawing feeling that we MUST set map->page to NULL. That is I can see how it is not needed if you are using 'map' and 'unmap' together - for that we are good. But what I am worried is that some one unmaps it .. and instead of checking map->hva they end up checking map->page and think the page is mapped. Would you be OK adding that extra statement just as a fail-safe mechanism in case someones misues the APIs?
