From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 0607ba8403c4cdb253f8c5200ecf654dfb7790cc ]

Ever since cdf7abc4610a ("srcu: Allow use of Tiny/Tree SRCU from
both process and interrupt context"), it has been permissible
to use SRCU read-side critical sections in interrupt context.
This allows __call_srcu() to use SRCU read-side critical sections to
prevent a new SRCU grace period from ending before the call to either
srcu_funnel_gp_start() or srcu_funnel_exp_start completes, thus preventing
SRCU grace-period counter overflow during that time.

Note that this does not permit removal of the counter-wrap checks in
srcu_gp_end().  These check are necessary to handle the case where
a given CPU does not interact at all with SRCU for an extended time
period.

This commit therefore adds an SRCU read-side critical section to
__call_srcu() in order to prevent grace period counter wrap during
the funnel-locking process.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index a180abc8c925..697a2d7e8e8a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head 
*rhp,
                 rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
+       int idx;
        bool needexp = false;
        bool needgp = false;
        unsigned long s;
@@ -873,6 +874,7 @@ void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head 
*rhp,
                return;
        }
        rhp->func = func;
+       idx = srcu_read_lock(sp);
        local_irq_save(flags);
        sdp = this_cpu_ptr(sp->sda);
        spin_lock_rcu_node(sdp);
@@ -894,6 +896,7 @@ void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head 
*rhp,
                srcu_funnel_gp_start(sp, sdp, s, do_norm);
        else if (needexp)
                srcu_funnel_exp_start(sp, sdp->mynode, s);
+       srcu_read_unlock(sp, idx);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to