On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 23:38 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Therefore remove the well meant, but ill defined, distinction between "GPL" > and "GPL v2" and document that: > > - "GPL" and "GPL v2" both express that the module is licensed under GPLv2 > (without a distinction of 'only' and 'or later') and is therefore kernel > license compliant. > > - None of the MODULE_LICENSE strings can be used for expressing or > determining the exact license > > - Their sole purpose is to decide whether the module is free software or > not.
Thanks Thomas. Acked-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]> if you want that.
