On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 08:38:43AM +0000, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > On 2/1/19 10:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:44:15PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> The alternative would be to turn xenmem_reservation_scrub_page into a > >> regular function (not a static inline)? > > All that is a moot point until said currently out of tree module gets > > submitted for inclusion anyway. > Indeed this is a moot point, so I can't argue here. > But this is how it is and unfortunately we have to live > with those modules and depend on 3rd parties willing or not > to disclose their sources to public...
The point is that the kernel does generally not export interfaces not used by in-tree modules. So there is no reason to change anything here.