On 06.02.2019 12:24, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:46:28AM +0000, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06.02.2019 10:13, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:18:04PM +0100, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com>
>>>>
>>>> SAM9X60 uses high and low drive strengths. To implement this, in
>>>> at91_pinctrl_mux_ops::set_drivestrength and
>>>> at91_pinctrl_mux_ops::get_drivestrength we need bit numbers of
>>>> drive strengths (1 for low, 2 for high), thus change the code to
>>>> allow the usage of drive strength bit numbers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c 
>>>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>>>> index 3d49bbbcdbc7..31f06dafca2e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
>>>> @@ -72,10 +72,15 @@ static int gpio_banks;
>>>>   * DRIVE_STRENGTH_DEFAULT is just a placeholder to avoid changing the 
>>>> drive
>>>>   * strength when there is no dt config for it.
>>>>   */
>>>> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_DEFAULT            (0 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
>>>> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW          (1 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
>>>> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_MED          (2 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
>>>> -#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI           (3 << DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
>>>> +enum drive_strength_bit {
>>>> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_DEF,
>>>> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_LOW,
>>>> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MED,
>>>> +  DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_HI,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(name)      (DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_##name << \
>>>> +                                   DRIVE_STRENGTH_SHIFT)
>>>>  
>>>>  /**
>>>>   * struct at91_pmx_func - describes AT91 pinmux functions
>>>> @@ -551,7 +556,7 @@ static unsigned 
>>>> at91_mux_sama5d3_get_drivestrength(void __iomem *pio,
>>>>    /* SAMA5 strength is 1:1 with our defines,
>>>>     * except 0 is equivalent to low per datasheet */
>>>>    if (!tmp)
>>>> -          tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW;
>>>> +          tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(LOW);
>>>>  
>>>>    return tmp;
>>>>  }
>>>> @@ -564,7 +569,7 @@ static unsigned at91_mux_sam9x5_get_drivestrength(void 
>>>> __iomem *pio,
>>>>  
>>>>    /* strength is inverse in SAM9x5s hardware with the pinctrl defines
>>>>     * hardware: 0 = hi, 1 = med, 2 = low, 3 = rsvd */
>>>> -  tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI - tmp;
>>>> +  tmp = DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(HI) - tmp;
>>>>  
>>>>    return tmp;
>>>>  }
>>>> @@ -600,7 +605,7 @@ static void at91_mux_sam9x5_set_drivestrength(void 
>>>> __iomem *pio, unsigned pin,
>>>>  
>>>>    /* strength is inverse on SAM9x5s with our defines
>>>>     * 0 = hi, 1 = med, 2 = low, 3 = rsvd */
>>>> -  setting = DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI - setting;
>>>> +  setting = DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(HI) - setting;
>>>>  
>>>>    set_drive_strength(pio + at91sam9x5_get_drive_register(pin), pin,
>>>>                            setting);
>>>> @@ -959,11 +964,11 @@ static int at91_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev 
>>>> *pctldev,
>>>>    }                                       \
>>>>  } while (0)
>>>>  
>>>> -#define DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(mask,flag) do {      \
>>>> +#define DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(mask,flag,name) do { \
>>>
>>> checkpatch error: space required
>>
>> I'm aware of that but I added it in the way it was previously (were the
>> checkpatch error was still present). Please let me know if you want me to
>> send a new version fixing this.
> 
> I think it's the opportunity to fix it. If you can resend a new version
> including my ack.

Sure!

Thanks,
Claudiu

> 
> Regards
> 
> Ludovic
> 
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Claudiu Beznea
>>
>>>
>>>>    if ((config & mask) == flag) {          \
>>>>            if (num_conf)                   \
>>>>                    seq_puts(s, "|");       \
>>>> -          seq_puts(s, #flag);             \
>>>> +          seq_puts(s, #name);             \
>>>>            num_conf++;                     \
>>>>    }                                       \
>>>>  } while (0)
>>>> @@ -981,9 +986,12 @@ static void at91_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev 
>>>> *pctldev,
>>>>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(PULL_DOWN);
>>>>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(DIS_SCHMIT);
>>>>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(DEGLITCH);
>>>> -  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW);
>>>> -  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_MED);
>>>> -  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI);
>>>> +  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(LOW),
>>>> +                       DRIVE_STRENGTH_LOW);
>>>> +  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(MED),
>>>> +                       DRIVE_STRENGTH_MED);
>>>> +  DBG_SHOW_FLAG_MASKED(DRIVE_STRENGTH, DRIVE_STRENGTH_BIT_MSK(HI),
>>>> +                       DRIVE_STRENGTH_HI);
>>>>    DBG_SHOW_FLAG(DEBOUNCE);
>>>>    if (config & DEBOUNCE) {
>>>>            val = config >> DEBOUNCE_VAL_SHIFT;
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

Reply via email to