On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:02:06PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > 4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> 
> No objection.  But I think of this as a feature addition rather than a
> fix for something.  As a feature that we now allow something we
> previously did not does this qualify for a backport to stable?

Hi,

I had the exact same thought when I saw this this morning, and was planning
on replying tonight.

> It is probably no more harmful in this instance than adding PCI IDs to a
> driver.  So I am not worried.  I am curious the current guidelines
> are.
> 
> In most cases a small relaxation of permissions like this requires a lot
> of bug fixing as typically code protected by capable(CAP_XXX) has been
> written and tested assuming a trusted root user.  Those bug fixes are
> many times too large for a stable backport.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> > ------------------
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 8da0b4f692c6d90b09c91f271517db746a22ff67 ]
> >
> > Access to timerslack_ns is controlled by a process having CAP_SYS_NICE
> > in its effective capability set, but the current check looks in the root
> > namespace instead of the process' user namespace.  Since a process is
> > allowed to do other activities controlled by CAP_SYS_NICE inside a
> > namespace, it should also be able to adjust timerslack_ns.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181030180012.232896-1-bmgor...@google.com
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gordon <bmgor...@google.com>
> > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
> > Cc: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
> > Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> > Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@hallyn.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Oren Laadan <or...@cellrox.com>
> > Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiru...@google.com>
> > Cc: Rom Lemarchand <rom...@android.com>
> > Cc: Todd Kjos <tk...@google.com>
> > Cc: Colin Cross <ccr...@android.com>
> > Cc: Nick Kralevich <n...@google.com>
> > Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitr...@google.com>
> > Cc: Elliott Hughes <e...@google.com>
> > Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobri...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/proc/base.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> > index ce3465479447..98525af0953e 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> > @@ -2356,10 +2356,13 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file 
> > *file, const char __user *buf,
> >             return -ESRCH;
> >  
> >     if (p != current) {
> > -           if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
> > +           rcu_read_lock();
> > +           if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
> > +                   rcu_read_unlock();
> >                     count = -EPERM;
> >                     goto out;
> >             }
> > +           rcu_read_unlock();
> >  
> >             err = security_task_setscheduler(p);
> >             if (err) {
> > @@ -2392,11 +2395,14 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, 
> > void *v)
> >             return -ESRCH;
> >  
> >     if (p != current) {
> > -
> > -           if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
> > +           rcu_read_lock();
> > +           if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
> > +                   rcu_read_unlock();
> >                     err = -EPERM;
> >                     goto out;
> >             }
> > +           rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> >             err = security_task_getscheduler(p);
> >             if (err)
> >                     goto out;

Reply via email to