* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > * Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Newer gcc can generate some different instances of a function > > with suffixed symbols if the function is optimized and only > > has a part of that. (e.g. .constprop, .part etc.) > > > > In this case, it is not enough to check the entry of kprobe > > blacklist because it only records non-suffixed symbol address. > > > > To fix this issue, search non-suffixed symbol in blacklist if > > given address is within a symbol which has a suffix. > > > > Note that this can cause false positive cases if a kprobe-safe > > function is optimized to suffixed instance and has same name > > symbol which is blacklisted. > > But I would like to chose a fail-safe design for this issue. > > > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> > > Why did you not add Steven's Reviewed-by tag? The series looks fine otherwise, so I applied it with Steve's reviewed-by tag added. Thanks, Ingo
