Hi Marc, A gentle reminder on this one...
Thanks, Shameer > -----Original Message----- > From: Linuxarm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shameer > Kolothum > Sent: 14 January 2019 09:50 > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Linuxarm > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [PATCH v4] irqchip: gicv3-its: Use NUMA aware memory allocation for > ITS tables > > From: Shanker Donthineni <[email protected]> > > The NUMA node information is visible to ITS driver but not being used > other than handling hardware errata. ITS/GICR hardware accesses to the > local NUMA node is usually quicker than the remote NUMA node. How slow > the remote NUMA accesses are depends on the implementation details. > > This patch allocates memory for ITS management tables and command > queue from the corresponding NUMA node using the appropriate NUMA > aware functions. This change improves the performance of the ITS > tables read latency on systems where it has more than one ITS block, > and with the slower inter node accesses. > > Apache Web server benchmarking using ab tool on a HiSilicon D06 > board with multiple numa mem nodes shows Time per request and > Transfer rate improvements of ~3.6% with this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <[email protected]> > --- > > This is to revive the patch originally sent by Shanker[1] and > to back it up with a benchmark test. Any further testing of > this is most welcome. > > v3-->v4 > -Addressed comments on alloc_pages_node() and page_address() usage. > -Rebased on 5.0-rc1 > -Added Ganapatrao's R-by. > > v2-->v3 > -Addressed comments to use page_address(). > -Added Benchmark results to commit log. > -Removed T-by from Ganapatrao for now. > > v1-->v2 > -Edited commit text. > -Added Ganapatrao's tested-by. > > Benchmark test details: > -------------------------------- > Test Setup: > -D06 with dimm on node 0(Sock#0) and 3 (Sock#1). > -ITS belongs to numa node 0. > -Filesystem mounted on a PCIe NVMe based disk. > -Apache server installed on D06. > -Running ab benchmark test in concurrency mode from a remote m/c > connected to D06 via hns3(PCIe) n/w port. > "ab -k -c 750 -n 2000000 http://10.202.225.188/" > > Test results are avg. of 15 runs. > > For 4.20-rc1 Kernel, > ---------------------------- > Time per request(mean, concurrent) = 0.02753[ms] > Transfer Rate = 416501[Kbytes/sec] > > For 4.20-rc1 + this patch, > ---------------------------------- > Time per request(mean, concurrent) = 0.02653[ms] > Transfer Rate = 431954[Kbytes/sec] > > % improvement ~3.6% > > vmstat shows around 170K-200K interrupts per second. > > ~# vmstat 1 -w > procs -----------------------memory-- - -system-- > r b swpd free in > 5 0 0 30166724 102794 > 9 0 0 30141828 171148 > 5 0 0 30150160 207185 > 13 0 0 30145924 175691 > 15 0 0 30140792 145250 > 13 0 0 30135556 201879 > 13 0 0 30134864 192391 > 10 0 0 30133632 168880 > .... > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9833339/ > > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > index db20e99..5df59ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > @@ -1737,6 +1737,7 @@ static int its_setup_baser(struct its_node *its, > struct its_baser *baser, > u64 type = GITS_BASER_TYPE(val); > u64 baser_phys, tmp; > u32 alloc_pages; > + struct page *page; > void *base; > > retry_alloc_baser: > @@ -1749,10 +1750,11 @@ static int its_setup_baser(struct its_node *its, > struct its_baser *baser, > order = get_order(GITS_BASER_PAGES_MAX * psz); > } > > - base = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order); > - if (!base) > + page = alloc_pages_node(its->numa_node, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, > order); > + if (!page) > return -ENOMEM; > > + base = (void *)page_address(page); > baser_phys = virt_to_phys(base); > > /* Check if the physical address of the memory is above 48bits */ > @@ -2236,7 +2238,8 @@ static struct its_baser *its_get_baser(struct > its_node *its, u32 type) > return NULL; > } > > -static bool its_alloc_table_entry(struct its_baser *baser, u32 id) > +static bool its_alloc_table_entry(struct its_node *its, > + struct its_baser *baser, u32 id) > { > struct page *page; > u32 esz, idx; > @@ -2256,7 +2259,8 @@ static bool its_alloc_table_entry(struct its_baser > *baser, u32 id) > > /* Allocate memory for 2nd level table */ > if (!table[idx]) { > - page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, > get_order(baser->psz)); > + page = alloc_pages_node(its->numa_node, GFP_KERNEL | > __GFP_ZERO, > + get_order(baser->psz)); > if (!page) > return false; > > @@ -2287,7 +2291,7 @@ static bool its_alloc_device_table(struct its_node > *its, u32 dev_id) > if (!baser) > return (ilog2(dev_id) < its->device_ids); > > - return its_alloc_table_entry(baser, dev_id); > + return its_alloc_table_entry(its, baser, dev_id); > } > > static bool its_alloc_vpe_table(u32 vpe_id) > @@ -2311,7 +2315,7 @@ static bool its_alloc_vpe_table(u32 vpe_id) > if (!baser) > return false; > > - if (!its_alloc_table_entry(baser, vpe_id)) > + if (!its_alloc_table_entry(its, baser, vpe_id)) > return false; > } > > @@ -2345,7 +2349,7 @@ static struct its_device *its_create_device(struct > its_node *its, u32 dev_id, > nr_ites = max(2, nvecs); > sz = nr_ites * its->ite_size; > sz = max(sz, ITS_ITT_ALIGN) + ITS_ITT_ALIGN - 1; > - itt = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + itt = kzalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL, its->numa_node); > if (alloc_lpis) { > lpi_map = its_lpi_alloc(nvecs, &lpi_base, &nr_lpis); > if (lpi_map) > @@ -3486,6 +3490,7 @@ static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource *res, > void __iomem *its_base; > u32 val, ctlr; > u64 baser, tmp, typer; > + struct page *page; > int err; > > its_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res)); > @@ -3541,12 +3546,13 @@ static int __init its_probe_one(struct resource > *res, > > its->numa_node = numa_node; > > - its->cmd_base = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, > - get_order(ITS_CMD_QUEUE_SZ)); > - if (!its->cmd_base) { > + page = alloc_pages_node(its->numa_node, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, > + get_order(ITS_CMD_QUEUE_SZ)); > + if (!page) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto out_free_its; > } > + its->cmd_base = (void *)page_address(page); > its->cmd_write = its->cmd_base; > its->fwnode_handle = handle; > its->get_msi_base = its_irq_get_msi_base; > -- > 2.7.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxarm mailing list > [email protected] > http://hulk.huawei.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxarm

