On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:16:26PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Create a temporary struct vfs_lookup in file_permission() instead of
> passing a NULL value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -292,14 +292,15 @@ int vfs_permission(struct vfs_lookup *lo
> *
> * Used to check for read/write/execute permissions on an already opened
> * file.
> - *
> - * Note:
> - * Do not use this function in new code. All access checks should
> - * be done using vfs_permission().
Should this comment be removed?
> */
> int file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
> {
> - return permission(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode, mask, NULL);
> + struct vfs_lookup lookup;
> +
> + lookup.path = file->f_path;
> + lookup.flags = 0;
I tend to find this little bit cleaner:
struct vfs_lookup lookup = {
.path = file->f_path,
.flags = 0,
};
> +
> + return permission(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode, mask, &lookup);
> }
>
> /*
--
Humans were created by water to transport it upward.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
