Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer
<j.neuschae...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Contrary to the description, the first parameter (n) should not be
> passed as a pointer, but directly as an lvalue. This is possible because
> do_div is a macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschae...@gmx.net>
Thanks for your patch!
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
Shouldn't the "semantics" at the top of include/asm-generic/div64.h be
updated, too?
As this can't be expressed in a C function, perhaps that should be done
using C++ syntax, like
uint32_t do_div(uint64_t &n, uint32_t base)
{
...
}
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
