On 08.03.2019 13:46, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:26:47PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>
>> On 07.03.2019 15:14, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:39:46AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05.03.2019 15:25, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:58:32PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> SNIP
>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>          /*
>>>>>>           * Increment md->refcount to guard md->data[idx] buffer
>>>>>> @@ -350,7 +357,7 @@ int perf_mmap__aio_push(struct perf_mmap *md, void 
>>>>>> *to, int idx,
>>>>>>          md->prev = head;
>>>>>>          perf_mmap__consume(md);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -        rc = push(to, &md->aio.cblocks[idx], md->aio.data[idx], size0 + 
>>>>>> size, *off);
>>>>>> +        rc = push(to, md->aio.data[idx], size0 + size, *off, 
>>>>>> &md->aio.cblocks[idx]);
>>>>>>          if (!rc) {
>>>>>>                  *off += size0 + size;
>>>>>>          } else {
>>>>>> @@ -556,13 +563,15 @@ int perf_mmap__read_init(struct perf_mmap *map)
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  int perf_mmap__push(struct perf_mmap *md, void *to,
>>>>>> -                    int push(struct perf_mmap *map, void *to, void 
>>>>>> *buf, size_t size))
>>>>>> +                    int push(struct perf_mmap *map, void *to, void 
>>>>>> *buf, size_t size),
>>>>>> +                    perf_mmap__compress_fn_t compress, void *comp_data)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>          u64 head = perf_mmap__read_head(md);
>>>>>>          unsigned char *data = md->base + page_size;
>>>>>>          unsigned long size;
>>>>>>          void *buf;
>>>>>>          int rc = 0;
>>>>>> +        size_t mmap_len = perf_mmap__mmap_len(md);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>          rc = perf_mmap__read_init(md);
>>>>>>          if (rc < 0)
>>>>>> @@ -574,7 +583,10 @@ int perf_mmap__push(struct perf_mmap *md, void *to,
>>>>>>                  buf = &data[md->start & md->mask];
>>>>>>                  size = md->mask + 1 - (md->start & md->mask);
>>>>>>                  md->start += size;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +                if (compress) {
>>>>>> +                        size = compress(comp_data, md->data, mmap_len, 
>>>>>> buf, size);
>>>>>> +                        buf = md->data;
>>>>>> +                }
>>>>>>                  if (push(md, to, buf, size) < 0) {
>>>>>>                          rc = -1;
>>>>>>                          goto out;
>>>>>
>>>>> when we discussed the compress callback should be another layer
>>>>> in perf_mmap__push I was thinking more of the layered/fifo design,
>>>>> like:
>>>>>
>>>>> normaly we call:
>>>>>
>>>>>   perf_mmap__push(... push = record__pushfn ...)
>>>>>           -> reads mmap data and calls push(data), which translates as:
>>>>>
>>>>>           record__pushfn(data);
>>>>>                   - which stores the data
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> for compressed it'd be:
>>>>>
>>>>>   perf_mmap__push(... push = compressed_push ...)
>>>>>
>>>>>           -> reads mmap data and calls push(data), which translates as:
>>>>>
>>>>>           compressed_push(data)
>>>>>                   -> reads data, compresses them and calls, next push 
>>>>> callback in line:
>>>>>
>>>>>                   record__pushfn(data)
>>>>>                           - which stores the data
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> there'd need to be the logic for compressed_push to
>>>>> remember the 'next push' function
>>>>
>>>> That is suboptimal for AIO. Also compression is an independent operation 
>>>> that 
>>>> could be applied on any of push stages you mean.
>>>
>>> not sure what you mean by suboptimal, but I think
>>> that it can still happen in subsequent push callback
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> but I think this was the original idea behind the
>>>>> perf_mmap__push -> it gets the data and pushes them for
>>>>> the next processing.. it should stay as simple as that
>>>>
>>>> Agree on keeping simplicity and, at the moment, there is no any push to 
>>>> the next 
>>>> processing in the code so provided implementation fits as for serial as 
>>>> for AIO
>>>> at the same time sticking to simplicity as much as possibly. If you see 
>>>> something 
>>>> that would fit better please speak up and share.
>>>
>>> I have to insist that perf_mmap__push stays untouched
>>> and we do other processing in the push callbacks
>>
>> What is about perf_mmap__aio_push()?
>>
>> Without compression it does 
>>      memcpy(), memcpy(), aio_push()
>>
>> With compression its does
>>      memcpy_with_compression(), memcpy_with_compression(), aio_push()
> 
> so to be on the same page.. normal processing without compression is:
> 
>   perf_mmap__push does:
>       push(mmap buf)
>         record__pushfn
>           record__write
>             write(buf)
> 
>   perf_mmap__aio_push does:
>       memcpy(aio buf, mmap buf)
>         push(aio buf)
>           record__aio_pushfn
>             record__aio_write
>               aio_write(aio buf)
> 
> 
> and for compression it would be:
> 
>   perf_mmap__push does:
>       push(mmap buf)
>         compress_push
>           memcpy(compress buffer, mmapbuf)  EXTRA copy
>             record__pushfn
>               record__write
>                 write(buf)
> 
>   perf_mmap__aio_push does:
>       memcpy(aio buf, mmap buf)
>         memcpy(compress buffer, mmapbuf)    EXTRA copy
>           push(aio buf)
>             record__aio_pushfn
>               record__aio_write
>                 aio_write(aio buf)
> 
> 
> side note: that actualy makes me think why do we even have 
> perf_mmap__aio_push,
> it looks like we could copy the buf in the callback push function with no 
> harm?
> 
> so.. there's one extra memcpy for compression, is it right?

It is right for serial trace streaming.

For AIO there is no extra memcpy().
Plain memcpy() is replaced by the compressing one.

~Alexey

> I might miss some part which makes this scheme unusable..
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 

Reply via email to