On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:26:16 +0100 Heiner Kallweit <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10.03.2019 15:18, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:33:40 +0100 > > Heiner Kallweit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 09.03.2019 03:16, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote: > >>> After suspending, my r8169 (not actually 8169, just that driver) only > >>> receives packets when in promiscuous mode. I have tried disabling all > >>> offload features except highdma [fixed], and it doesn't fix the issue. > >>> > >>> I am using torvalds/linux, compiled about two days ago (not sure which > >>> commit). I think this happened after a recent upgrade (some time in the > >>> past week). Given the long testing cycle, I don't really want to bisect; > >>> I am hoping someone has some idea of where the issue could be. > >>> > >> The provided information isn't enough to say anything. Please create a > >> bug ticket in bugzilla. Needed information: > >> - Last working and first failing kernel version (as reported by uname -a) > >> - Is 5.0 ok? > >> - Full dmesg log > >> - lspci -vv output for the network card > >> - If the issue happens only after resume from suspend, diff of the > >> chip registers (ethtool -d) before and after suspend. > >> - Does removing / reloading the r8169 module fix the issue? > >> > >>> Please CC me on replies. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Alex. > >>> > >> Heiner > > > > Bugzilla is not really used by Linux network developers. > > I just filter/forward mail from bugzilla into netdev. > > > To make sure I understand you correctly: > Are you just saying "network developers don't actively scan bugzilla" > or do you want to say that bugzilla shouldn't be used in general for > netdev bugs/issues? What would be the right tool then? both. Please use the [email protected] mailing list for discussions.
