On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:58:27PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 03/10/2019 06:49 AM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > Switch from per mm_struct to per pmd page table lock by enabling
> > ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. This provides better granularity for
> > large system.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if there is contention on mm->page_table_lock. Given
> > the option comes at no cost (apart from initializing more spin
> > locks), why not enable it now.
> > 
> > We only do so when pmd is not folded, so we don't mistakenly call
> > pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() on pud or p4d in pgd_pgtable_alloc(). (We
> > check shift against PMD_SHIFT, which is same as PUD_SHIFT when pmd
> > is folded).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuz...@google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  3 +++
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h     |  5 ++++-
> >  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index cfbf307d6dc4..a3b1b789f766 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -872,6 +872,9 @@ config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
> >  config ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
> >     def_bool y
> >  
> > +config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK
> > +   def_bool y if PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
> > +
> >  config SECCOMP
> >     bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
> >     ---help---
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h 
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> > index 52fa47c73bf0..dabba4b2c61f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> > @@ -33,12 +33,22 @@
> >  
> >  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long 
> > addr)
> >  {
> > -   return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> > +   struct page *page;
> > +
> > +   page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> > +   if (!page)
> > +           return NULL;
> > +   if (!pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(page)) {
> > +           __free_page(page);
> > +           return NULL;
> > +   }
> > +   return page_address(page);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmdp)
> >  {
> >     BUG_ON((unsigned long)pmdp & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
> > +   pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(virt_to_page(pmdp));
> >     free_page((unsigned long)pmdp);
> >  }
> 
> There is just one problem here. ARM KVM's stage2_pmd_free() calls into 
> pmd_free() on a page
> originally allocated with __get_free_page() and never went through 
> pgtable_pmd_page_ctor().
> So when ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK is enabled
> 
> stage2_pmd_free()
>       pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()
>               ptlock_free()
>                       kmem_cache_free(page_ptl_cachep, page->ptl)
> 
> Though SLUB implementation for kmem_cache_free() seems to be handling NULL 
> page->ptl (as the
> page never got it's lock allocated or initialized) correctly I am not sure if 
> it is a right
> thing to do.

Thanks for reminding me. This should be fixed as well. Will do it
in a separate patch.

Reply via email to