On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 03:18:40PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> SDM845 SoC has an always-on interrupt controller (PDC) with select GPIO
> routed to the PDC as interrupts that can be used to wake the system up
> from deep low power modes and suspend.
> 
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdm845-pinctrl.txt    | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

I still don't love this being specific to wake-up, but don't have a 
better suggestion. One nit, otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>

> 
> diff --git 
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdm845-pinctrl.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdm845-pinctrl.txt
> index 665aadb5ea28..f0fedbc5d41a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdm845-pinctrl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sdm845-pinctrl.txt
> @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ SDM845 platform.
>       Definition: must be 2. Specifying the pin number and flags, as defined
>                   in <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>  
> +- wakeup-parent:
> +     Usage: optional
> +     Value type: <phandle>
> +     Definition: A phandle to the wakeup interrupt controller for the SoC.
> +
>  - gpio-controller:
>       Usage: required
>       Value type: <none>
> @@ -53,7 +58,6 @@ pin, a group, or a list of pins or groups. This 
> configuration can include the
>  mux function to select on those pin(s)/group(s), and various pin 
> configuration
>  parameters, such as pull-up, drive strength, etc.
>  
> -
>  PIN CONFIGURATION NODES:
>  
>  The name of each subnode is not important; all subnodes should be enumerated
> @@ -160,6 +164,7 @@ Example:
>               #gpio-cells = <2>;
>               interrupt-controller;
>               #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +             wake-parent = <&pdc_intc>;

wakeup-parent

>  
>               qup9_active: qup9-active {
>                       mux {
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 

Reply via email to