On 2019-03-13 17:55:47 [+0100], To [email protected] wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > > There is no need for sched_rcu. The undocumented reason why sched_rcu > is used is to avoid a few explicit rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pairs by > the fact that sched_rcu reader side critical sections are also protected > by preempt or irq disabled regions. > > Replace rcu_read_lock_sched with rcu_read_lock and acquire the RCU lock > where it is not yet explicit acquired. Replace local_irq_disable() with > rcu_read_lock(). Update asserts. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > [bigeasy: mangle changelog a little] > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
A gentle ping. Sebastian
