This commit changes a rcu_exp_handler() comment from rcu_preempt_defer_qs()
to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() in order to better match reality.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 4c2a0189e748..ec4fb93a5dbe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
         *
         * If the CPU is fully enabled (or if some buggy RCU-preempt
         * read-side critical section is being used from idle), just
-        * invoke rcu_preempt_defer_qs() to immediately report the
+        * invoke rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() to immediately report the
         * quiescent state.  We cannot use rcu_read_unlock_special()
         * because we are in an interrupt handler, which will cause that
         * function to take an early exit without doing anything.
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to