On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:49:17PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 01:36:28PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > At the end, it is reduced to our usage, we are running QEMU inside > > docker to test kernel changes with limitation on number of CPUs to use. > > The systems are optimized to boot kernel as soon as possible in order > > to run tests and on my machine (64 CPUs) reduce is visible: from ~2.6 > > sec to ~2.3 sec from execution to kernel boot. > > You're kidding, right? > > 0.3 sec boot time "improvement" for a kernel on which you run tests > which take orders of magnitude longer (I assume). And you want to hide > this message in the upstream kernel because you want to minimally speed > up *your* *specific* usage ? > > And we still are wasting time talking about this?!
I understand your point, we will keep it internally. Sorry for wasting your time. Thanks > > Oh boy. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
