On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:48 AM Junge, Terry <terry.ju...@poly.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, March 28, 2019 6:49 AM Benjamin Tissoires > <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Nicolas, > >> > >> V4 looks good to me. > > > >Looks good to me too. > > > >Terry, can I consider this as a formal Rev-by you? > > Benjamin, > > Yes, thank you. What is the normal way of formally indicating Rev-by? >
Thanks. So giving a rev-by is described in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst section 13. Basically, you just answer a patch with: "Reviewed-by: Your Name <y...@address.sth>" (without quotes). This has 2 benefits: it's formal, and everybody understands it, and patchwork (at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10873179/ for this patch) will catch it. Then with the patchwork client, I can apply the patch without having to manually add your tag :) (no need to resend one here, unless you want to give a try, I'll apply it manually). Cheers, Benjamin
