4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Andrea Righi <[email protected]> commit 3897b6f0a859288c22fb793fad11ec2327e60fcd upstream. Parity page is incorrectly unmapped in finish_parity_scrub(), triggering a reference counter bug on i386, i.e.: [ 157.662401] kernel BUG at mm/highmem.c:349! [ 157.666725] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI The reason is that kunmap(p_page) was completely left out, so we never did an unmap for the p_page and the loop unmapping the rbio page was iterating over the wrong number of stripes: unmapping should be done with nr_data instead of rbio->real_stripes. Test case to reproduce the bug: - create a raid5 btrfs filesystem: # mkfs.btrfs -m raid5 -d raid5 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde - mount it: # mount /dev/sdb /mnt - run btrfs scrub in a loop: # while :; do btrfs scrub start -BR /mnt; done BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812845 Fixes: 5a6ac9eacb49 ("Btrfs, raid56: support parity scrub on raid56") CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c @@ -2414,8 +2414,9 @@ static noinline void finish_parity_scrub bitmap_clear(rbio->dbitmap, pagenr, 1); kunmap(p); - for (stripe = 0; stripe < rbio->real_stripes; stripe++) + for (stripe = 0; stripe < nr_data; stripe++) kunmap(page_in_rbio(rbio, stripe, pagenr, 0)); + kunmap(p_page); } __free_page(p_page);
