Sudeep, Lorenzo, Mark On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 12:15, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:10:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, April 12, 2019 12:02:27 PM CEST Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > PSCI v1.1 introduced SYSTEM_RESET2 to allow both architectural resets > > > where the semantics are described by the PSCI specification itself as > > > well as vendor-specific resets. Currently only system warm reset > > > semantics is defined as part of architectural resets by the specification. > > > > > > This patch implements support for SYSTEM_RESET2 by making using of > > > reboot_mode passed by the reboot infrastructure in the kernel. > > > > > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/firmware/psci.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > include/uapi/linux/psci.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > [...] > > > > -- > > > > So I queued up the PSCI series from Ulf which clashes with this patch. > > > > Ah OK, I wasn't aware(just back from holiday) that it's going through > your tree. No worries, I will rebase and repost soon. I want testing > by xilinx or Aaro Koskinen before that. > > > I can take this one too, but I'd rather avoid becoming a PSCI maintainer as > > a > > result. :-) > > > > I can understand, I assure it's one off :)
Speaking about that. I would gladly help out to host a git tree to collect patches that you have acked. In this way, we can, for example, get the patches pre-tested in linux next before we send the pull-request. If you think sounds like a good idea, just tell me so I can prepare a tree for the next release cycle... Kind regards Uffe
