On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 00:05, Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > check_prev_add_irq() tests all incompatible scenarios one after the > other while adding a lock (@next) to a tree dependency (@prev): > > LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ vs LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ > LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ vs LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ > LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ vs LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ > LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ vs LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ
May I ask why LOCK_USED_IN_*IRQ vs. LOCK_ENABLED_*IRQ_READ is not tested? Thanks, Yuyang

