On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:10 AM Evan Green <evgr...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Intel Comet Lake has the same LPSS than Intel Cannon Lake.
> > Add the new IDs to the list of supported devices.

> >  static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
> > +       /* CML */
> > +       { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02a8), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
> > +       { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02a9), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
> > +       { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02aa), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
> > +       { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02ab), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
> > +       { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02c5), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info },
> > +       { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02c6), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info },
>
> How come it's not cnl_i2c_info?

This is a good question, that's why Jarkko asked Lee to hold on until
we have confirmation about i2c timings.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to