On 4/22/19 11:05 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:10:56AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva escreveu:
>> Fix lock/unlock imbalance by moving the call to up_read() just after
>> the *out* label.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1444762 ("Missing unlock")
>> Fixes: 2db7b1e0bd49 ("perf bpf: Return NULL when RB tree lookup fails in 
>> perf_env__find_btf()")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/util/env.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c
>> index 9494f9dc61ec..6a3eaf7d9353 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
>> @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ struct btf_node *perf_env__find_btf(struct perf_env 
>> *env, __u32 btf_id)
>>      }
>>      node = NULL;
>>  
>> -    up_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
>>  out:
>> +    up_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock);
>>      return node;
>>  }
> 
> too late, this was fixed already, also detected by coverity :-)
> 

Good to know it's fixed now. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Reply via email to