[ Upstream commit 0d3bd18a5efd66097ef58622b898d3139790aa9d ] In case cma_init_reserved_mem failed, need to free the memblock allocated by memblock_reserve or memblock_alloc_range.
Quote Catalin's comments: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/26/482 Kmemleak is supposed to work with the memblock_{alloc,free} pair and it ignores the memblock_reserve() as a memblock_alloc() implementation detail. It is, however, tolerant to memblock_free() being called on a sub-range or just a different range from a previous memblock_alloc(). So the original patch looks fine to me. FWIW: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> Cc: Laura Abbott <[email protected]> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> --- mm/cma.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c index 7d266e393c44..1f4a7e076a5c 100644 --- a/mm/cma.c +++ b/mm/cma.c @@ -340,12 +340,14 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base, ret = cma_init_reserved_mem(base, size, order_per_bit, res_cma); if (ret) - goto err; + goto free_mem; pr_info("Reserved %ld MiB at %pa\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M, &base); return 0; +free_mem: + memblock_free(base, size); err: pr_err("Failed to reserve %ld MiB\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M); return ret; -- 2.19.1
