On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 04/24, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > -#define DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(name)
> > > > \
> > > > +#define __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name, is_static)
> > > > \
> > > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, __percpu_rwsem_rc_##name);
> > > > \
> > > > -static struct percpu_rw_semaphore name = {
> > > > \
> > > > +is_static struct percpu_rw_semaphore name = {
> > > > \
> > > > .rss = __RCU_SYNC_INITIALIZER(name.rss),
> > > > \
> > > > .read_count = &__percpu_rwsem_rc_##name,
> > > > \
> > > > .rw_sem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name.rw_sem),
> > > > \
> > > > .writer = __RCUWAIT_INITIALIZER(name.writer),
> > > > \
> > > > }
> > > > +#define DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name) \
> > > > + __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name, /* not static */)
> > > > +#define DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(name) \
> > > > + __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name, static)
> > >
> > > Which tree is this against? It doesn't apply to tip:master nor latest
> >
> > OOPS, sorry Ingo!
> >
> > I forgot that the change above depends on another cleanup I sent to Paul,
> >
> > [PATCH] rcu/sync: kill rcu_sync_type/gp_type
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> >
> > which does
> >
> > - .rss = __RCU_SYNC_INITIALIZER(name.rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC),
> > \
> > + .rss = __RCU_SYNC_INITIALIZER(name.rss),
> > \
> >
> > so lets forget it for now, or may be Paul can take this patch too.
>
> No problem, and both rwsem patches you sent seem fine to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
I queued patches with Ingo's reviewed-by. Thank you both!
Thanx, Paul
