On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, Petr Mladek wrote:

> WARN_ON_ONCE() could not be called safely under rq lock because
> of console deadlock issues. Fortunately, there is another check
> for the reliable stacktrace support in klp_enable_patch().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>

Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbe...@suse.cz> with a nit below

> ---
>  kernel/livepatch/transition.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> index 9c89ae8b337a..8e0274075e75 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> @@ -263,8 +263,15 @@ static int klp_check_stack(struct task_struct *task, 
> char *err_buf)
>       trace.nr_entries = 0;
>       trace.max_entries = MAX_STACK_ENTRIES;
>       trace.entries = entries;
> +

Unnecessary new line?

>       ret = save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(task, &trace);
> -     WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -ENOSYS);
> +     /*
> +      * pr_warn() under task rq lock might cause a deadlock.
> +      * Fortunately, missing reliable stacktrace support has
> +      * already been handled when the livepatch was enabled.
> +      */
> +     if (ret == -ENOSYS)
> +             return ret;
>       if (ret) {
>               snprintf(err_buf, STACK_ERR_BUF_SIZE,
>                        "%s: %s:%d has an unreliable stack\n",

Miroslav

Reply via email to