On Mon, 6 May 2019 11:08:59 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> These functions really should be called trace_*() > > Also; I _really_ hate how fat they are. Why can't we do simple straight > forward things like: > > trace_pelt_cfq(cfq); > trace_pelt_rq(rq); > trace_pelt_se(se); > > And then have the thing attached to the event do the fat bits like > extract the path and whatnot. I'd like to avoid functions called "trace_*" that are not trace events. It's getting confusing when I see a "trace_*()" function and then go look for the corresponding TRACE_EVENT() just to find out that one does not exist. sched_trace_*() maybe? -- Steve
