From: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit b13023421b5179413421333f602850914f6a7ad8 ]

In rxrpc_destroy_all_calls(), there are two phases: (1) make sure the
->calls list is empty, emitting error messages if not, and (2) wait for the
RCU cleanup to happen on outstanding calls (ie. ->nr_calls becomes 0).

To avoid taking the call_lock, the function prechecks ->calls and if empty,
it returns to avoid taking the lock - this is wrong, however: it still
needs to go and do the second phase and wait for ->nr_calls to become 0.

Without this, the rxrpc_net struct may get deallocated before we get to the
RCU cleanup for the last calls.  This can lead to:

  Slab corruption (Not tainted): kmalloc-16k start=ffff88802b178000, len=16384
  050: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 61 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b  kkkkkkkkakkkkkkk

Note the "61" at offset 0x58.  This corresponds to the ->nr_calls member of
struct rxrpc_net (which is >9k in size, and thus allocated out of the 16k
slab).

Fix this by flipping the condition on the if-statement, putting the locked
section inside the if-body and dropping the return from there.  The
function will then always go on to wait for the RCU cleanup on outstanding
calls.

Fixes: 2baec2c3f854 ("rxrpc: Support network namespacing")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/call_object.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
@@ -684,27 +684,27 @@ void rxrpc_destroy_all_calls(struct rxrp
 
        _enter("");
 
-       if (list_empty(&rxnet->calls))
-               return;
-
-       write_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
+       if (!list_empty(&rxnet->calls)) {
+               write_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
 
-       while (!list_empty(&rxnet->calls)) {
-               call = list_entry(rxnet->calls.next, struct rxrpc_call, link);
-               _debug("Zapping call %p", call);
-
-               rxrpc_see_call(call);
-               list_del_init(&call->link);
-
-               pr_err("Call %p still in use (%d,%s,%lx,%lx)!\n",
-                      call, atomic_read(&call->usage),
-                      rxrpc_call_states[call->state],
-                      call->flags, call->events);
+               while (!list_empty(&rxnet->calls)) {
+                       call = list_entry(rxnet->calls.next,
+                                         struct rxrpc_call, link);
+                       _debug("Zapping call %p", call);
+
+                       rxrpc_see_call(call);
+                       list_del_init(&call->link);
+
+                       pr_err("Call %p still in use (%d,%s,%lx,%lx)!\n",
+                              call, atomic_read(&call->usage),
+                              rxrpc_call_states[call->state],
+                              call->flags, call->events);
+
+                       write_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);
+                       cond_resched();
+                       write_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
+               }
 
                write_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);
-               cond_resched();
-               write_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
        }
-
-       write_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);
 }


Reply via email to