On 08-May 21:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> There was a bunch of repetition that seemed fragile; does something like
> the below make sense?

Absolutely yes... will add to v9, thanks.
 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched/core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -770,6 +770,9 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_ma
>  /* All clamps are required to be less or equal than these values */
>  static struct uclamp_se uclamp_default[UCLAMP_CNT];
>  
> +#define for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id)  \
> +     for ((clamp_id) = 0; (clamp_id) < UCLAMP_CNT; (clamp_id)++)
> +
>  /* Integer rounded range for each bucket */
>  #define UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, 
> UCLAMP_BUCKETS)
>  
> @@ -790,6 +793,12 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(i
>       return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void uclamp_se_set(struct uclamp_se *uc_se, unsigned int value)
> +{
> +     uc_se->value = value;
> +     uc_se->bucket_id = uclamp_bucket_id(value);
> +}
> +
>  static inline unsigned int
>  uclamp_idle_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id, unsigned int 
> clamp_value)
>  {
> @@ -977,7 +986,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct
>       if (unlikely(!p->sched_class->uclamp_enabled))
>               return;
>  
> -     for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> +     for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id)
>               uclamp_rq_inc_id(p, rq, clamp_id);
>  
>       /* Reset clamp idle holding when there is one RUNNABLE task */
> @@ -992,7 +1001,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct
>       if (unlikely(!p->sched_class->uclamp_enabled))
>               return;
>  
> -     for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> +     for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id)
>               uclamp_rq_dec_id(p, rq, clamp_id);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1021,16 +1030,13 @@ int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct c
>       }
>  
>       if (old_min != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min) {
> -             uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN].value =
> -                     sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min;
> -             uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN].bucket_id =
> -                     uclamp_bucket_id(sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min);
> +             uclamp_se_set(&uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MIN],
> +                           sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min);
>       }
> +
>       if (old_max != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max) {
> -             uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX].value =
> -                     sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max;
> -             uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX].bucket_id =
> -                     uclamp_bucket_id(sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max);
> +             uclamp_se_set(&uclamp_default[UCLAMP_MAX],
> +                           sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max);
>       }
>  
>       /*
> @@ -1052,7 +1058,7 @@ static void uclamp_fork(struct task_stru
>  {
>       unsigned int clamp_id;
>  
> -     for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> +     for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id)
>               p->uclamp[clamp_id].active = false;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1067,17 +1073,12 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void)
>               cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp_flags = 0;
>       }
>  
> -     for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> -             struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &init_task.uclamp_req[clamp_id];
> -
> -             uc_se->value = uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> -             uc_se->bucket_id = uclamp_bucket_id(uc_se->value);
> -     }
> +     for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id)
> +             uclamp_se_set(&init_task.uclamp_req[clamp_id], 
> uclamp_none(clamp_id));
>  
>       /* System defaults allow max clamp values for both indexes */
> -     uc_max.value = uclamp_none(UCLAMP_MAX);
> -     uc_max.bucket_id = uclamp_bucket_id(uc_max.value);
> -     for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> +     uclamp_se_set(&uc_max, uclamp_none(UCLAMP_MAX));
> +     for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id)
>               uclamp_default[clamp_id] = uc_max;
>  }
>  
> 

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi

Reply via email to