On 22/08/07, James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > Oops, never mind - tail still follows secmark, so that shouldn't matter. > > So I'm not sure why we are getting a bad value for secmark here - should > > be initialized to zero and never modified unless there is an iptables > > secmark rule. > > Michal, do you see this in current git?
No, I do not see this problem in 2.6.23. I had similar problem last month, but it is fixed now. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/12/362 Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
