On Wed 15-05-19 11:41:14, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Ditto.

Proper changelog or simply squash those patches into a single patch if
you do not feel like copy&paste is fun

> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 2bf210229daf..781879a91e3b 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -832,7 +832,10 @@ static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  
>       memset(&mss, 0, sizeof(mss));
>  
> -     down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +     ret = down_read_killable(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto out_put_mm;

Why not ret = -EINTR. The seq_file code seems to be handling all errors
AFAICS.

> +
>       hold_task_mempolicy(priv);
>  
>       for (vma = priv->mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> @@ -849,8 +852,9 @@ static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  
>       release_task_mempolicy(priv);
>       up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> -     mmput(mm);
>  
> +out_put_mm:
> +     mmput(mm);
>  out_put_task:
>       put_task_struct(priv->task);
>       priv->task = NULL;

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to