On Sun, 2019-05-19 at 17:36 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 17:52 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Jitao:
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 14:04 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > > DSI panel driver need attach function which is inculde in
> > > mipi_dsi_host_ops.
> > >
> > > If mipi_dsi_host_register is not in probe, dsi panel will
> > > probe fail or more delay.
> >
> > I think this patch just prevent delay, not to prevent dsi panel probe
> > fail. In [1], you mention mipi_dsi_attach() is called in
> > panel_simple_dsi_probe(), but panel_simple_dsi_probe() is trigger by
> > mipi_dsi_host_register(), so the probe would success.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c?h=v5.0-rc6#n2987
> >
> >
>
> Yes, this just prevent delay.
>
> > >
> > > So move the mipi_dsi_host_register to probe from bind.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao....@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > index b00eb2d2e086..6c4ac37f983d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > @@ -1045,12 +1045,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct
> > > device *master, void *data)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> > > - goto err_ddp_comp_unregister;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > ret = mtk_dsi_create_conn_enc(drm, dsi);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > DRM_ERROR("Encoder create failed with %d\n", ret);
> > > @@ -1060,8 +1054,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct
> > > device *master, void *data)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > err_unregister:
> > > - mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host);
> > > -err_ddp_comp_unregister:
> > > mtk_ddp_comp_unregister(drm, &dsi->ddp_comp);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1097,31 +1089,37 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > >
> > > dsi->host.ops = &mtk_dsi_ops;
> > > dsi->host.dev = dev;
> > > + dsi->dev = dev;
> >
> > Why do this?
> >
> > Regards,
> > CK
> >
>
> There are some error message require this poweron().
So this should not be in this patch. This patch is related to the timing
of mipi_dsi_host_register().
Regards,
CK
>
> > > + ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 0, 0,
> > > &dsi->panel, &dsi->bridge);
> > > if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > > + goto err_unregister_host;
> > >
> > > dsi->engine_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "engine");
> > > if (IS_ERR(dsi->engine_clk)) {
> > > ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->engine_clk);
> > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get engine clock: %d\n", ret);
> > > - return ret;
> > > + goto err_unregister_host;
> > > }
> > >
> > > dsi->digital_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "digital");
> > > if (IS_ERR(dsi->digital_clk)) {
> > > ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->digital_clk);
> > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get digital clock: %d\n", ret);
> > > - return ret;
> > > + goto err_unregister_host;
> > > }
> > >
> > > dsi->hs_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "hs");
> > > if (IS_ERR(dsi->hs_clk)) {
> > > ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->hs_clk);
> > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get hs clock: %d\n", ret);
> > > - return ret;
> > > + goto err_unregister_host;
> > > }
> > >
> > > regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >
> >
> >
>
>
