On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:16:57AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > + if (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_LOCAL_MEM) > > + return gen_pool_dma_alloc(hcd->localmem_pool, size, dma); > > Does this patch now break things? hcd->localmem_pool at this point in > time is NULL, so this call will fail. There's no chance for any host > controller driver to actually set up this pool in this patch, so is > bisection broken? > > I think you fix this up in later patches, right? > > And if so, why do we even need HCD_LOCAL_MEM anymore? Can't we just > test for the presence of hcd->localmem_pool in order to determine which > allocation method to use?
True. And that also sound like a good bisectability strategy: - first add hcd->localmem_pool and test for it - convert drivers over to it - remove HCD_LOCAL_MEM
