On Fri, 17 May 2019 14:20:11 -0300
Helen Koike <[email protected]> wrote:

> If the system has other devices being registered in the component
> framework, the compare function will be called with a device that
> doesn't belong to vimc.
> This device is not necessarily a platform_device, nor have a
> platform_data (which causes a NULL pointer dereference error) and if it
> does have a pdata, it is not necessarily type of struct vimc_platform_data.
> So casting to any of these types is wrong.
> 
> Instead of expecting a given pdev with a given pdata, just expect for
> the device it self. vimc-core is the one who creates them, we know in
> advance exactly which object to expect in the match.
> 
> Fixes: 4a29b7090749 ("[media] vimc: Subdevices as modules")
> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>

> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-core.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-core.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-core.c
> index 3aa62d7e3d0e..23992affd01f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-core.c
> @@ -244,10 +244,7 @@ static void vimc_comp_unbind(struct device *master)
>  
>  static int vimc_comp_compare(struct device *comp, void *data)
>  {
> -     const struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(comp);
> -     const char *name = data;
> -
> -     return !strcmp(pdev->dev.platform_data, name);
> +     return comp == data;
>  }
>  
>  static struct component_match *vimc_add_subdevs(struct vimc_device *vimc)
> @@ -277,7 +274,7 @@ static struct component_match *vimc_add_subdevs(struct 
> vimc_device *vimc)
>               }
>  
>               component_match_add(&vimc->pdev.dev, &match, vimc_comp_compare,
> -                                 (void *)vimc->pipe_cfg->ents[i].name);
> +                                 &vimc->subdevs[i]->dev);
>       }
>  
>       return match;

Reply via email to