On 2019-05-21 09:51, Eric Wong wrote:
Roman Penyaev <[email protected]> wrote:
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 81da4571f1e0..9d3905c0afbf 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <net/busy_poll.h>
/*
@@ -185,6 +186,9 @@ struct epitem {
/* The structure that describe the interested events and the source
fd */
struct epoll_event event;
+
+ /* Work for offloading event callback */
+ struct work_struct work;
};
/*
Can we avoid the size regression for existing epoll users?
Yeah, ->next, ->rdllink, ->ws are not used for user polling, so can hold
work
struct and co (or pointer on container which holds work struct, if work
struct
is huge).
--
Roman
