From: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
commit 70b464918e5331e488058870fcc6821d54c4e541 upstream.
During several error paths in the function
regulator_set_voltage_unlocked() the value of 'ret' can take on negative
error values. However, in calls that go through the 'goto out' statement,
this return value is lost and return 0 is used instead, indicating a
'pass'.
There are several cases where this function should legitimately return a
fail instead of a pass: one such case includes constraints check during
voltage selection in the call to regulator_check_voltage(), which can
have -EINVAL for the case when an unsupported voltage is incorrectly
requested. In that case, -22 is expected as the return value, not 0.
Fixes: 9243a195be7a ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Cc: stable <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3360,15 +3360,12 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocke
/* for not coupled regulators this will just set the voltage */
ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, state);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out2;
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ voltage->min_uV = old_min_uV;
+ voltage->max_uV = old_max_uV;
+ }
out:
- return 0;
-out2:
- voltage->min_uV = old_min_uV;
- voltage->max_uV = old_max_uV;
-
return ret;
}
