Lawsuits take money and alot of time, Jeff. No suit has yet been filed:
why do you decree that an issue that is only a few months old is
"settled"? You may have noticed that the Geek Feminists, as far as I
know, have not chosen to re-post the work of authorship in question, nor
do they, as far as I know, distribute it at all, post-revocation. Tell
me, Jeff, what would they be sued for? Their license was revoked and
they have not chosen to redistribute the work or make derivatives
post-revocation.
There was no "attempt": the license _was_ revoked.
It seems you are ignorant of property law, Jeff, along with licensing
and the differences between licenses and license contracts.
Jeff Read on 2019-05-14 at 18:14:21 said:
My guess: none of it. I think most if not all of the revokist
shitposting being conducted here and on lkml has been mikeeUSA himself.
Note that when one of the revokist posts appears here, it often gets
sidetracked into ramblings about how men built open source and how an
adult man should be able to marry, rape, or rape and then marry a girl
as young as 12 or 13 per Biblical law. These are all mikee talking
points. Have been since 2005. They could be a really good faker, but I
doubt anyone would risk shitting up lkml with nonsense, trigger the
more senstive readers, or just act like an unprofessional ass if they
want to remain in good standing.
Besides, Mikee put his revokist theories to the test earlier this year,
by attempting to rescind modification and distribution rights under the
GPL from Geek Feminism wiki members to the only significant code
he\u2019s ever written: a shitty text mode slot machine game.
Nothing more to see here. Revokism is a failed revolution by a single
man \u2014 a man who has made no substantive contribution to open
source and who believes that God gave him the right to fuck kids.
