* Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:
> The correct spelling is EACCES: > > include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h:#define EACCES 13 /* Permission denied > */ > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h > index 0ab99c7b652d41b1..10569e25b5a9b656 100644 > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h > @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ struct pmu { > * -EBUSY -- @event is for this PMU but PMU temporarily > unavailable > * -EINVAL -- @event is for this PMU but @event is not valid > * -EOPNOTSUPP -- @event is for this PMU, @event is valid, but not > supported > - * -EACCESS -- @event is for this PMU, @event is valid, but no > privilidges > + * -EACCES -- @event is for this PMU, @event is valid, but no > privilidges > * > * 0 -- @event is for this PMU and valid > * Actually, -EACCES got typoed itself and survived due to historic reasons. I think we can tolerate the 'typo' fixed in documentation, can we? Also, the *far* bigger typo is, in the same line: s/privilidges /privileges :-) Thanks, Ingo
